CO129-537-9 Prisons Ordinance 1932 1-12-1932 - 8-12-1932 — Page 2

G536

8.12.2

Yo

Ordmase

In the table of correspondence under

Section 6 I do not understand the words "last

three lines of s.s.(3) omitted".

There is no

such Section (3) Section 6 in either the old such Section (3)

or the new Ordinance.

Otherwise, I have no obsons. The

changes made in the law seem all to be in the

right direction.

? Sanction Ordinance on lines of G.3

mentioning the point in the first paragraph of

this minute, and saying it is probably a misprint.

No legal

oburrat i'm

the law

described

I have

名

How Jameso

6.2.33

Copsegin

7/2/33

the slight relapati in of

in suction 7(4) can hardly

the

no

double

"right

that

вы

#

direction but

it exporsoes moth

what is practically

practically possible I do not my gust

correctly in Hong King

neumay

تلن

ic.

that

to comment on

the Comparatin

Per mis pöial in

Table

necd

I think,

loe menti ined

dectin 5

_ it has "slipped" form the remarke on

Lignify

non-disallowane LF 4. Custom

&tlalder

20.2.331572

다